Three solar quotes with three different bottom lines and none of them are comparable.
Each installer used their own assumptions about your shade, your roof, and how your electric rate will grow. We rebuild every quote on one set of numbers, then rank them against the option missing from the quotes: leaving the money invested.
Run the free quote check on your quote →Instant. No account, no email. Every assumption is shown along with its source.We don’t sell panels, and installers never get your contact info.For more detail and to compare quotes, get the full $29 report.
Delivered in 24 hours. Full refund within 7 days if the report doesn’t help you decide.
How it works
1. Check one quote free.
Enter the numbers from your quote and see the answer right away. No email needed.
2. Get the in-depth report if you need more.
Have more than one quote, a lease, or a loan? Order the $29 report and fill in a short form. Blanks are fine.
3. Take the numbers back to your installer.
Within 24 hours you get your quotes ranked, the price to ask for, and the questions to ask.
Why this site exists
I built a fifteen-tab spreadsheet to decide this for my own house. I put hours into analysis and research, and my model was wrong. You shouldn’t have to go through that process.
Two installers with four configurations of panels and a battery option on each. High efficiency or standard panels. Eleven columns across fifteen sheets, built to make a $45,000 decision.
For weeks my model told me the best option lost $98,000 compared to the S&P 500. Every solar scenario delivered negative NPV. Seven of the eight scenario sheets were subtracting the avoided electric bill instead of adding it, and I hadn’t noticed.
I fixed the error and the numbers still fought me:
- A sizing difference of 250 kWh was worth $5,187. My utility pays an incentive only if production stays under 120% of usage. A 38-panel proposal projected generation 1.4% over that ceiling, which disqualified the system. A setup with two fewer panels collected $5,187. The installer made a note but sent the quote anyway.
- The battery option lost $10,238 in every version, because it wasn’t connected to my model! The off-peak arbitrage that would justify it was worked out on a different tab and not wired into the model. The spreadsheet didn’t compute the number the proposals hinged on.
- The best answer in the model was a system that couldn’t be built. The south roof fits 32 panels. Every 36- and 38-panel column was unbuildable, and nothing in fifteen sheets recorded that. Re-ranked against the roof, the 32-panel system I actually bought was the best buildable option on every metric: highest return, shortest payback, the only one not underwater at ten years. I eventually got it all working and made the right decision, but it was a slog!
A capable person, with real quotes, motivated by his own money, spending hours, produced a model that returned garbage for weeks before it worked. That’s the whole problem with solar quotes, and it’s why you need a software tool rather than a spreadsheet you built yourself.
Everything below runs on an engine built to catch all the things I missed the first time through and many more.
The fine print
Where solar contracts cost people money
Solar is a 20 to 25 year financial commitment attached to your roof, and most people only buy it once. These are the traps to watch for.
- Hidden dealer fees making the loan look cheap. A low rate like 3.99% often comes with a fee the lender adds to your balance. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau found these fees usually run 10 to 30 percent of the cash price, sometimes more than half, and that salespeople often don’t explain them.1 At a 25% fee, a $24,000 system turns into a $32,000 loan on day one.
- Increased payments after month 19. Many solar loans were built around the 30% tax credit. The lender expects you to pay down about 30% of the loan in the first 18 months. If you don’t, your monthly payment goes up.1 That credit is gone for cash and loan buyers, so ask your installer whether your loan works this way before you sign.
- Lease escalators. A $115 lease payment that rises 2.9% a year is $228 a month by year 25. And if you sell the house, the buyer has to take over the lease, or you pay to get out of it.
- Expired tax credits. The 30% federal credit for home solar ended Dec 31, 2025.2 If a salesperson promises you one on a cash or loan purchase, that promise is out of date. Ask them to put it in writing.
- Incentive size caps. Some utilities stop paying an incentive once a system produces more than a set share of your past usage. My installer’s design missed that line by 1.4%, and it would have cost me $5,187.
- Bundled batteries. One savings number for panels and battery together hides whether the battery pays for itself. On my house, it didn’t.
What this looks like in practice
Three different homeowners, three different messes
These are hypothetical but realistic scenarios, built from the problems this engine actually solves.
Wayne, Aurora, Illinois. Three quotes, three different approaches.
Wayne got three quotes from three companies. They used different panel brands, different system sizes, and different assumptions, so none of them were comparable. One was conservative about sunlight and showed a long road to positive ROI. Another showed lots of sun, a little shade, and a short payback. The third insisted he needed a battery to make the numbers work.
Wayne spent evenings trying to convert one quote’s metrics into another’s terms, but didn’t know whose assumptions to trust as his baseline. Every quote felt wrong, and he had no way to know which one was or why.
Here’s what the tool does with Wayne’s three quotes: rebuilds all three on one set of numbers (same production assumption, same rate escalation, same panel degradation), strips the battery out of the third quote’s price so it’s comparable to the other two, and prices the battery separately as its own investment. Then it ranks all three against a benchmark none of the installers used: leaving the money invested instead.
The report doesn’t just say “quote 2 is best.” It says: quote 2 wins on price per watt, but quote 3 maximizes your roof’s capacity. Here’s what that’s worth, and here’s the configuration to take back to quote 2’s installer to get the best deal.
Dana: a lease that looked cheaper than buying.
Dana’s lease quote showed a lower monthly payment than the loan quote for the same system. On paper, the lease won. Dana worried she was missing something, but couldn’t put her finger on what it was.
The tool takes the five numbers from the lease (upfront, monthly, escalator, term, buyout) and runs the whole structure over 25 years against purchasing the same system and against not installing at all. The escalator, which looked harmless at 2.9%, compounds into the biggest number on the page by year 15.
Marcus: the battery that was never given a chance to win.
Marcus lives in Fresno, California, and uses about 503 kWh a month, the state average.3 He had two quotes for the same 3.6 kW system at $3.25 per watt, the California median.4 One installer added a Tesla Powerwall 3 at $13,473, its typical installed price,5 and showed one savings number for the whole package. The other quoted panels only, and insisted a battery would never pay off.
The tool takes the battery out of the first quote and prices it as its own investment against his actual rate plan. PG&E puts new solar customers on its Electric Home rate (E-ELEC), where summer evenings from 4 to 9 pm cost 55¢ a kWh.6 What PG&E pays for his exports changes by the hour. It’s about 1¢ at midday in spring, and more than $1 on August evenings in his first three years.78
The battery saves him about $726 in its first year. Over its 10-year warranty, those savings are worth $5,316 in today’s dollars. That’s $8,157 less than the battery costs, so investing the $13,473 does better. The panels-only installer was right about this battery at this price. The report still gives Marcus the price that would change the answer: under $5,316, the battery beats investing. That’s less than half of what it costs installed today.
What your $29 buys
An excerpt from the report, on a house like yours
This is the report’s own math on one house in Massachusetts. The free check runs the same math on your quote, and the report runs it on every quote you’ve got.
Excerpt: a 7.5 kW quote in Cambridge, Massachusetts
Cost and production. At 29¢/kWh, a 7.5 kW system bought with cash at $3.40 per watt costs $25,500, with no federal credit. NREL’s PVWatts expects it to make about 8,625 kWh in its first year. What that’s worth depends on something the installer’s proposal leaves out: what the utility pays for the power the system sends back to the grid.
Two export-credit cases. If the utility credits exports at the full retail rate, the system takes about $2,501 off the first-year bill and pays for itself in about 9.5 years. Over 25 years it returns 10.3% a year. That’s after maintenance and a $1,650 inverter replacement in year 13. If exports earn a quarter of retail, it saves about $1,374 in the first year and takes about 17.2 years to pay back. Its return drops to 3.9%. The bar is 9.4%. That’s the S&P 500’s long-run 10.0%, less 15% tax on the gains. So it’s a yes under one tariff and a no under the other. The report tells you which one you’re on, and the one phone call that settles it.
Comparisons with investing. Bank each year’s savings at the 3.9% T-bill rate and they add up to about $126,000 by year 25 with full credit. With the lower credit, it’s about $66,000. Put the same $25,500 into 3-month T-bills on day one and it grows to about $60,000. In an S&P 500 index fund at the 1928 to 2025 average, taxed at 15% on the gains at the end, it reaches about $240,000. Nobody guarantees that return, and the index has halved twice since 2000. Massachusetts SMART incentives aren’t in these numbers, and they would make solar look better.
Inputs: 8,600 kWh/yr use, 29¢/kWh, 7.5 kW DC at $3.40/W, 1,150 kWh per kW per year, no federal credit, 25-year horizon, export credit run at 100% and at 25% of retail. Savings reinvested at the T-bill rate (FRED DGS3MO); benchmark returns from Damodaran, NYU Stern; lump sums taxed at 15% on gains. Every figure here is calculator output, pinned by a test.
What the $29 in-depth report will tell you
The modelling that took me weeks to build
All your quotes on one set of numbers.
Different panel counts, different wattages, batteries bundled into some prices and not others: quotes aren’t comparable as written. We normalize them, strip the bundling, and rebuild each at one production assumption before comparing anything.
Counteroffers to take back to your installer.
The configuration and price to take back to a specific installer: the negotiating column. In my own workbook, the most valuable columns were quotes that didn’t exist yet. You also get the highest price at which that system still beats investing, so you know when to stop negotiating.
Incentives checked against their size limits.
The incentives from your quotes, along with their constraints, and any other programs listed for your ZIP code that your quotes don’t mention. If a system is over a size cap, the report shows by how much. The report gives you the questions to ask your installers.
Batteries priced as their own investment, not bundled.
If a battery never returns your money, the report says by how much, why, and whether waiting changes the answer.
Comparisons with investing the same money.
The system’s cost, offset by bill savings invested as they occur at market rates, compared with the same amount invested in the market on day one and taxed on gains at the end. The discount-rate choice is stated clearly. It answers the most important financial question of all: “Is this purchase better than leaving the money invested?”
Buy, lease and PPA comparisons on real terms.
Give us the five numbers off the lease (upfront, monthly, escalator, term, buyout) and it models what this costs over 25 years against buying the same system, or not buying at all.
Dealer fees inside your loan.
Low-rate solar loans often carry a fee the lender adds to your balance.1 The report shows how much of your loan is fee, and prices the loan at what you’ll actually repay.
Our commitments to you: we won’t sell you panels, we don’t collect referral fees, your contact info never goes to installers, and the report says “don’t buy” when the math says “don’t buy.”
Delivered in 24 hours. Full refund within 7 days if it doesn’t help you decide.After checkout you’ll complete a short form: address, utility, electric usage, and your quotes. Start with whatever you have. Blanks are fine if you don’t know; we have sources for your area’s averages. We’ll show you our standard assumptions and give you the chance to enter your own.
Free first, then the full math
Run the free check. Then decide if you need the rest.
| Free check | $29 in-depth report | |
|---|---|---|
| Quotes | 1 | Up to 3, ranked |
| Price per watt and production check | Yes | Yes |
| Solar against investing | Yes | Yes |
| Target price for your installer | No | Yes |
| Loan dealer fee | No | Yes |
| Lease and PPA, year by year | Warning only | Yes |
| Incentive size caps | Flagged | Checked, in kWh and panels |
| Battery as its own investment | No | Yes |
| Turnaround | Instant | Within 24 hours |
The free check tells you how your quote compares to the average. If you’ve got more than one quote, or a lease offer, the in-depth report will help you decide.
What $29 buys
Priced against what the alternatives cost
- Solar contracts: $25,000 or more, and you live with it for 20 to 25 years. $29 is about a tenth of a percent of that.
- Independent energy consultants: billed by the hour, for a single-home analysis.
- Installers’ “free analyses”: $0, and they’re part of the sales funnel installers run you through. Can you trust them?
- DIY spreadsheets: my spreadsheet took fifteen tabs and several weeks of night and weekend work, and it almost cost me thousands of dollars on a bad decision. That story is above. Save the time and energy. Avoid the risk of mistakes.
The guarantee, in full: full refund within 7 days if the report doesn’t help you make the decision. Email us and say so. You don’t have to justify it.
How this works
We’re not in the solar business
Common questions
Before you order
One of two things happens
Either the math says your quote is a good deal, and you’ll have the numbers to prove it, or it says the deal is bad, or the lease is worse than it looks, or the battery is a $10,000 mistake. Either way, you’ll know what to do and how to get the best deal for your specific situation.
Both outcomes are worth $29. Avoiding an expensive mistake is worth a lot more than that.
Delivered in 24 hours. Full refund within 7 days if it doesn’t help you decide.Or start with the free quote check →Sources
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Solar Financing Market: Issue Spotlight, August 2024. Sections “Hidden Markups and Fees” and “Misrepresentations and Omissions Concerning Prepayments.” Read the report (PDF)
- One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Public Law 119-21 (2025), section 70506, ending the residential clean energy credit (26 U.S.C. § 25D) for expenditures made after December 31, 2025. IRS summary of the change
- U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2024 Average Monthly Bill, Residential (Table 5A): California, 503 kWh a month. Read the table (PDF)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Tracking the Sun: California median installed price, $3.25 per watt, 7,038 systems installed in 2025. Tracking the Sun
- EnergySage, Tesla Powerwall 3 review, updated May 15, 2026: $13,473 typical installed cost before incentives, 13.5 kWh usable. Read the review
- PG&E, Electric Schedule E-ELEC (Electric Home), total bundled rates and time periods, effective June 1, 2026. PG&E requires residential Solar Billing Plan customers to take service on this schedule. Read the tariff (PDF)
- PG&E, Solar Billing Plan export rates: the 2026 vintage's export value for each hour of each month and calendar year, weekday and weekend, generation plus delivery. Download the export rate files (ZIP)
- PG&E, Electric Schedule NBT (Net Billing Tariff): the 2026 residential ACC Plus adder of 0.88¢ per kWh exported, for nine years. Read the tariff (PDF)
The excerpt lists its own sources with its inputs. The $5,187, 1.4%, and $10,238 figures come from the founder’s own workbook.